Comments on: You’ve Probably Never Heard of My Favorite PDF Viewer, Okular http://www.itproblemchild.com/2009/08/youve-probably-never-heard-of-my-favorite-pdf-viewer-okula/ That "special" developer who doesn't use the company standard Windows XP image Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:40:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Heiko http://www.itproblemchild.com/2009/08/youve-probably-never-heard-of-my-favorite-pdf-viewer-okula/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Heiko Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:20:56 +0000 http://www.itproblemchild.com/?p=42#comment-20 My favorite is also Okular... Why? The fast startup and the fast rendering on complex documents (I have a document with a "confidential" across it - Okular is 10 times faster on it. Similar for pictures in documents). Still two reasons to have Adobe: 1) It can print (Okular cannot do this for me?!) 2) Adobe can fill in documents My favorite is also Okular… Why? The fast startup and the fast rendering on complex documents (I have a document with a “confidential” across it – Okular is 10 times faster on it. Similar for pictures in documents).

Still two reasons to have Adobe:
1) It can print (Okular cannot do this for me?!)
2) Adobe can fill in documents

]]> By: Evan http://www.itproblemchild.com/2009/08/youve-probably-never-heard-of-my-favorite-pdf-viewer-okula/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Evan Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:08:11 +0000 http://www.itproblemchild.com/?p=42#comment-2 Hmm interesting.. I have only used Adobe Reader myself.. I generally don't often find myself wading through PDF's of large nature.. but I recently had some large D&D manuals in PDF form.. I find it difficult to read them at a desktop machine, but I suppose if I had a netbook/e- reader or some such thing, I might be more inclined to search out alternatives.. I can see why you would appreciate the table-of-contents-search Hmm interesting.. I have only used Adobe Reader myself.. I generally don’t often find myself wading through PDF’s of large nature.. but I recently had some large D&D manuals in PDF form.. I find it difficult to read them at a desktop machine, but I suppose if I had a netbook/e- reader or some such thing, I might be more inclined to search out alternatives.. I can see why you would appreciate the table-of-contents-search

]]>